Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle icon

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle



НазваниеZhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle
Дата конвертации23.10.2012
Размер46.66 Kb.
ТипДокументы

Zhuravlev I. K.

Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle

Modern European civilization, which the proud Europeans consider the only true civilization in the world, has its history in which there are “improperly many” white spots. The origin itself of this great civilization that has dominated in the world for the last few centuries and even imposed on it its “civilizing standards” remains far from clear.

The European civilization cannot be related to the ancient civilizations. European historians see in its youth a great advantage for it was able to feed on the main achievements of the ancient civilizations which in the opinion of European social scientists have reached the deadlock having used up their civilizing potential and slid to gross barbarism. The ancient civilizations which have exhausted themselves allegedly have been replaced by the European civilization which does not identify itself with any other civilization in the world.

From the point of view of the European specialists in history this “supercivilization” came into being on an empty place giving birth to itself like the Greek goddess Aphrodite who emerged from marine foam. However it is impossible. Some more ancient source is required, as a historic prerequisite. No such source of their civilization cannot be indicated by Europeans. Nevertheless it does exist, and it should be looked for in antiquity which was the starting point of the development of all European culture. “It is in antiquity where the sources of many of the values should be looked for, of the values that later made up European culture. [11] The term “antiquity” is today understood as “Greek and Roman” antiquity. And, in fact, the kind of antiquity until which there was not anything in Europe at all besides “the chaos of barbarism”. In reality Greek and Roman antiquity was preceded by “Russian antiquity” which formed first Greek and then Roman civilization.

“We know from history that many peoples came to Europe from the Orient: Etruscans, Celts, Scythians, Aryans, Huns, Hungarians… They brought to the new land their original culture and traditions setting up new cities, states and civilizations”.[12] Most of these tribes were Slavs coming from the far away Arctida, which went under water. And civilization created by them on the lands of the Mediterranean area was the Russian one in which the language of interethnic communication was ancient Russian. This Russian civilization embracing practically the whole of Europe and the entire Mediterranean coast disappeared leaving no traces which may be regretted. But, in the first place, some traces remained. It is just that European historians did not want, or, rather, were not interested in looking for its lost and trampled down traces.
And, secondly, regret is somewhat irrelevant because “vanished” civilization had fully carried out its divine predestination, namely, it turned to life the numerous European tribes that had lost link with God and therefore were doomed. Having fulfilled its mission, Russian-European civilization did not disappear but it went off into the thick forests of the Russian plane where it awaited its further destiny, a tragic one but ultimately lucky. At present there have appeared, at last, some historians of a knew kind, Slavic primarily who, like pathfinders, find halferazed traces of the lost (not vanished!) ancient civilization, and using those traces restore a relatively full historic picture. It may be mentioned that uptodate three ancient cities have been taken out “the sands of oblivion” and presented to the world community. They are Troy, Rome and Jerusalem which form “the great Russian Triangle”.

Let us begin with Tray. “Excavation of ancient Troy began anew ten years ago. Let us say at once that in itself this modest jubilee would not have been the reason for returning to the environment of the Hill Hissarlyk, the fatewilling mountain of Asia Minor”. Simply the situation at present of the Troyan excavations begins to remind one of the well known episodes from the time of the great geographic discoveries: the fearless seafarers allegedly discovering a new way to the rich in spices India found after some time that they had discovered a continent hitherto unknown to mankind… “That continent was ancient Russian civilization and this continent remains unknown to mankind up till now with the exception of some enthusiasts”. It is quite clear from the aforementioned that from now on to call Troy a Greek city would be wrong. Although the results of the excavation of the Bronze Age Anatolia provide academics with more topics for discussion than with proven facts. In any case one thing is indisputable: the striking phenomenon of the culture of ancient Greece – the great creations of artists and thinkers, the architectural relics of Mikenas, Pinoee and Tirinf, the examples of the activities of antique politicians, in other words all that we in admiration call “Mankind’s Golden Age” may not have appeared out of nothing. Greek culture has real sources and roots which should be looked for beyond Greece. [7] There are also more specific assertions on this point. “In historical literature the Troyans are correlated with the Etruscans who, in turn, are considered to be a Slavic people. It is known that the Etruscans came to central Europe from beyond the Urals about four thousand years ago during the Great Migration of Peoples”. [12]

At present some researches are inclined to think that the Etruscans and the Russians are the same people. In so far as it is the Etruscans who founded the legendary Troy, this makes it possible to consider this city-state to be one of the most important fragments of the ancient Russian civilization which spread in the whole of the Mediterranean and far beyond its boundaries. The name itself – Troy – may say a lot about its “Russianness” if to correlate it with Old Russian written sources and, above all, with the “Word about Igor’s Regiment”. It should be mentioned that many researchers turned to this source but most of them failed to give up the established standards of “colonial history approach” imposed on us by the European academic community. European historiographer and research standards were imposed on Russia many hundreds of years. “From these positions Greek and Latin written languages which had already existed fifteen centuries earlier looked like heavy blocks and Greek and Roman culture became standards of Western civilization as a whole. Therefore the Slavs were for a long time looked at as some very recent arrivals in Europe who may have remained barbarians till today. However in reality it is a myth which the West forcefully propagated both in its own countries and from the 18th century in Russia when academics from abroad, mainly Germans, were invited to the newly set up Academy of Sciences in Saint-Petersburg. On the one hand they brought to science in Russia some fresh achievements of the West, but on the hand, Russian historiography and linguistics were buried – especially by the works of Miller, Baier and Schloezer. Some new historiography and linguistics appeared instead – now pro-Western. On modern terms they were ideas of globalization of science and, so to speak, “accustoming Russia to common human values”. As a result Russia voluntary almost, almost without any fighting, surrendered its positions and achievements in historiography. In other words, at the opening of our own Academy of Sciences we were not ready for information wars with the West. [9;8] (Our interests were defended only by M. V. Lomonosov who is not considered to be a historian by many modern historians of academic orientation).

Let us look at the origin of Troy and its name from the position of the Russian science of history which is returning to life. For this purpose let us return to the “Word of Igor’s Regiment”. In this work the adjective “Troyani” is used four times. (Another version of this word is “Troyanya”). As most scientists think, the adjective is derived from the proper name “Troyan”. There four fragments imply the following contents: Troyan’s centuries, Troyan’s seventh century, Troyan’s land and Troyan’s path. There is some meaning behind this contents which remained hidden from present day researchers. Trying to find out this hidden meaning researchers divided into several directions: historical – those who consider Troyan a real person, e. g. a Roman emperor; mythological – those who consider Troyan a pagan God; abstract – those who reduce the mentioning of Troyan to some metaphor with some unclear contents; compilatory – those who try to combine several points of view; and, finally, negative – those who believe that in the version of “Word about Igor’s Regiment” known to us, Troyan’s name is mentioned because of some misunderstanding. Note should be made that none of these directions brought about any satisfactory results. Therefore it is better to ignore them and look at this work as a literary monument having only some oblique relation to documents of history.

It is necessary to take into account also the fact that this literary monument is at the same time a political manifesto. Now it is possible to pass on to analyzing of some particular text episodes.

It is not possible to understand “Troyan’s centuries” as specific dates as most researchers attempt to do. In reality Troyan’s centuries are old times. The author of “Word…” regrets that those happy times are in the past. Those times are connected with the triumph of the Vedic orthodox beliefs which researchers wrongly call paganism. These Orthodox Church people were given the name “Slavs”, i. e. those who maintain orthodox religious beliefs. This is the opinion of some present day specialists in history. “It is obvious that the religion of the Slavs should be called the world religion or the religion of the world”.[8] These ancient orthodox people believed in the One God. Three heads that is called Trinity in Christianity. The author of the “Word about Igor’s Regiment” is a Russian orthodox man for whom vedism and orthodox Christianity are the same. Therefore he could equally call the orthodox God both Threeheands and Trinity. But he chooses “the middle term” – Troyan thus hinting that does not give any preference to either the old or the new belief. The term is also good because it contrests the Slavic God Threehead – Trinity – Troyan and the Roman pagan God Janus who, as is known, had not three but two faces: the old one looking at the past and the young looking at the future.

“The legend said Janus was the tsar of Lazium – the birthplace of the Latin language: he taught his people how to build ships, plough land and grow vegetables. Apparently for all that Saturn awarded him the ability to know the past and envisage the future. Hence the two faces: at the front and at the back. Then Janus was proclaimed the protector of everything fundamental. His name was given to the first month of the year – January. Also he was the God of the doors: every house begins with the doors. As the Romans’ main occupation was war, Janus could not fail to be involved. An arc-shaped temple was built in his honour the doors of which opened when the Roman troops took the field.

In peace time the doors of the temple were locked. As everything was in reality is not exactly known, but historians counted that the temple could have remained closed more than a year only three times during the hundreds of years of the existence of the Roman Empire. At that time it was necessary, in order to retain power, to endlessly carry out military operations. [4] The two-faced Janus turned out to be hypocritical in the most negative meaning of this world. On the one hand he was a guide from the past to the future, on the other hand he proclaimed that the only way to the future was through war. Hence the two-faced Janus’es path was the path of was and, respectively Troyan’s path was the path of peace. The expression Troyan’s ramparts known to historians defensive work is used in the same meaning. Just defensive work intended to preserve peace in the condition of non-stopping aggressive attacks on the part of neighbouring peoples and states. Troyan’s land is a Russian land in ancient times once including the Mediterranean. The author of the “Word about Igor’s Regiment” is sorry that the Russian land catastrophically diminished in size as the “shagreen leather”. He indicated the cause of this too, namely, the internecine wars among the princes throwing Rus into the abyss of sin since such wars are incompatible with the ever young religion of the Threehead, Trinity, Triyan.

At the same time it is seen from the “Word…” that the religion the author of the “Word…” adheres to also has a different name, namely, the religion of Dazhdgod-Christ. That it is so is seen from the following passage: the “life of Dazhgod’s grandchildren perished and the human lifetime shortened in the princely edition”.[5] But why grandchildren and not sons. Here it is religion that is involved. All human beings brought up in Christianity may be considered Dazhdgod-Christ’s children. ‘The sons of Dazhdgod” could be the name referring to the representatives of the ancient Russian civilization defeated by the Europeans. Dazhdgod’s grandchildren are descendants of this civilization that disappeared. These descendants set up principalities on the Russian plain. In connection with this it is possible to assert that “Troyan’s Age” was the time of the highest prosperity of the Old Russian civilization. “Troyan’s seventh century” is the time when that civilization perished of the legendary Atlantida. To be more precise: not about the perishing but about the withdrawal from Europe. Here “the seventh century” has something in common with the Biblical seventh in Day of the creation of the world. As is known there were six days of creation and on the seventh day God decided to rest “having set free the created world”. Similarly to this the Russian Mediterranean civilization created during six historic days (six days) the new Greek-Latin civilization and “having fulfilled its mission, which was from God, set free the created world” withdrawing to the North-East. Left to itself, Europe tried as soon as possible to forget about its past and about its teachers. One cannot exclude the possibility that the legend conveyed to us by antique thinkers about the perishing of the Atlantis in fact narrates about the perishing of the old Russian civilization swallowed not by the marine abyss but by the “waters of oblivion”. It was not accidents that archeologist Eberhard Zangerr identified Troy with the capital of the mythological superpower Atlantis. E. Zangerr is called the main trouble maker among archeologists but in this case he may have been right.

The fragments of the Russian civilization were forced out from Europe gradually. Thus, according to one version, mentioned yet by Plutarch, the residents of Tray who remained alive after the city’s fall managed to board the ships which the wind brought to the coast of Etruria and stood on anchor near the mouth of the Tiber. Here they founded a city which later became the capital of the Roman Empire. The name of the city was Mir that was peace (or the world). This may have symbolized the religious center of the world. But it may also be understood as “peace to the world” which is characteristic of Russian self-consciousness. Significant in this respect is the name of the Russian spiritual centre Ladoga which implies harmony, peace, agreement. However let us return to historical Rome (Peace). V. A. Chudinov writes in his article “The cross of Veliterna. Is it early Christianity or late Vedism?”: “We read on the stone to left the word RIM and on the stone to the right the word MIR which convinces us again that RIM=MIR that is that the city RIM (Rome) was given the Russian word MIR”. “While reading Etruscan writings I understood that the city Rome was given its name by the Russians who founded it and built it. But the word MIR when read from right to left (this manner of reading was becoming fashionable) it began to be read as RIM (Rome)”.[6] V. A. Chudinov justly remarks that in this case the reverse reading of the word was caused not by fashion but by the really existing contradiction of interests in the form of verbal opposition. “Why does the word “RIM” exists only in Russian while in Latin or Italian there exists only “ROMA” and not “RIM”. The suggested explanation is as follows. The canonical formula of Latin legislation, expressed by the words “Lirbis et arbis” translated as “to the city and the world” in the meaning “to the city and the world”, i. e. “to the city and population” in its turn requires some explanation. Its word for word translation is “to the city and the environment” that is to the city and surrounding population. Which is not at all the same. Its original Russian meaning “To the world and Rome”, i. e. “to the Russian city and the Latin population surrounding it”. Still more correct: “to the Russian MIR and the opposing Latin RIM”. Thus it was Russian city MIR (possibly a religious centre) pronounced by the surrounding Latin people as A-MOR. This is explained by V. A. Chudinov…” [6]

The theory suggested by V. A. Chudinov is attractive and this, strangely enough, causes suspicion of the “scientific community where the conviction exists that beauty belongs to art rather than to science. Therefore many refer Chudinov’s ideas to fantasy. It is not at all justified. Here it will be timely to remember Einstain who considered beauty on of the important criteria of the veracity of a scientific theory. It is also possible to recall Dostoevsky’s “Beauty will save the world”. Beauty not as a meaningless “beautifulness” but as a manifestation of Divine Truth.

RIM=MIR, that is it the same city. But at the same time RIM is the same MIR but through some negative attitude to it, that is it some antiMIR. This was a manifestation of the negative and even hostile attitude of the Latin population that surrounded this Slavic city. “It was this that determined the ethnic contradiction of the Russian city dwellers and the local Latin people. In Russian it was expressed by the verbal contradiction “MIR (Russian – RIM (Latin)”. Similarly in Latin the verbal contradiction was “Amor (Russian) – Roma (Rome) (Latin). Then it is in the city and not in its environs where takes place the natural change in the ratio of the Russian and Latin population in favour of the Latin component. It ended by the Latin revolution and the suppression or extermination of the Russian population. Henceforth the city has the name of the winners, i. e. Roma (Rome). There is no more of any Amor, there is the purely Latin city Roma. This corresponds with the metaphorical history of the twin brothers Romul (Roma) and Rem (Rim). Here we find the Traditionally Russian attitude to those who a close to them, invariably treated as brothers. Let us remember the “brotherly” republics which existed recently. It was typical of Russian perception. Then, however, “brother” Romul kills his “brother” Rem. That is the local Latin population surrounding the city helped by assistants already settled in the city breaks into it and exterminates the Russians. That population themselves become city dwellers. The Russians naturally disappear from this story and are never mentioned again. The scientific puzzle of the Etruscans emerges, the Etruscans who preceded the Romans, had a higher level of urban culture and who suddenly disappeared forever nobody knows where and how. [6]

At present Rim is the Russian name of the Italian city Roma. But it is no longer the city which was built by the Russians. They built Mir – a peaceful city of a civilized people dedicated to God. The Latin city Rim (Roma) is the capital of an empire pursuing a colonial policy and indifferent to religious life. Serving the God was in fact replaced by serving Satan which showed itself in unstoppable lewdness. This is made particularly clear by the example of the Roman Emperor Nero who remains a mysterious figure up to date. “From 55 to 60 B. C. Nero became consul four times. In the opinion of many Roman historians the Emperor showed himself as a highly efficient administrator and calculating ruler unlike during the 2nd half of his rule. Practically all his actions during this period were aimed at making easier the life of the ordinary citizens and enchaining his power by his popularity among the people. At the same time persecution began of the followers of the new religion – Christianity. At that time the main adepts of Christianity were slaves and emancipated slaves as well as people from the lower layers of society whom Nero tried to protect during the first years of his rule. Although religion was not banned officially worshipping the new GOD was practically deprived of any protection by the state.

At the same time Nero began to gradually pay less attention to governing the country. His interest increasingly concentrated on art. [13] It is possible to add to this that Nero was a highly educated man. His teacher and then his political adviser was the well-known philosopher Seneca. Nero is a solid ball of contradictions but the future historians tried hard to cover fully with black ascribing Nero such atrocities he never committed ranging from extreme mockery of Christians to blind hatred in relation to human beings in general.

The contradictory characteristic of Nero fully corresponds with that of Seneka, his teacher. “On the one hand Seneca’s philosophy is highly moral. On the other hand it does not cultivate high moral qualities in man. Moreover it justifies any sinner as weak and defenceless before Fate and hence incapable of rising to the lofty moral ideals”. Speaking of the nature of man one has to admit that man is weak and quite helpless, immersed in vice and sin and is almost fully deprived of the possibility to come out of his sinful state. Seneca’s God is not a personal God of Christianic monotheism, his fiery world wisdom does not have anything in common with the Christianic concept of a personal God. Seneca is not free from striking contradictions also in understanding God. His is simultaneously both a fire, putting it differently – a body, and an idea, wisdom, a creative force, a loving father. For the departure of the world from the truth God sets a world fire, in which the world perishes without leaving any traces; only the humidity remaining after the world fire is a trace pf the perished world and a guarantee of the emergence of a new better world. The image of the blazing up fire self burning like Heracles after his deeds and thus getting punished for its sins and atrocities, is an expressive depiction by Seneca of the fate of the world and the world process. Nevertheless the world faces this destiny not because of the God’s anger. Everything in the world takes place… according to nature’s laws, and even God is not powerful to change matter”. [1: 491-492]

Nero turned out to be a good pupil who not only very well assimilated the contradictory philosophy of his teacher Seneca but also conceived to carry out his teaching in practice. Nero imagined himself to be “the weapon of fate” chosen by God, the realization of the devine will, the ruler of the world’s fate and the world’s order. Executing and pardoning is in his power. Considering himself to be the image of God and like him Nero tried to be at the same time a fire burning the world and a loving father for the people. The burning fire destroys the old world in order to set up a new one at his place. Therein lies the mystery of the famous fire or Rome (Roma). “Svetonius says that the initiator of the fire was Nero himself and that people saw in the yards people with torches in hand. According to legends, when the emperor was told about the fire he went towards Rome and watched the fire from a safe distance. He was wearing a theatrical costume, played the lyre and recited a poem on the destruction of Troy… However modern historians are more inclined to rely upon the description of the events given by Tacitus who survived the fire as a child. He says Nero immediately went to Rome and at his own expense organized teams to save the city and its people. Also, yet during the fire, he worked out a new plan of the construction plan for the city. In the plan Nero established the minimal distance between the houses, the minimal width of the new streets, made obligatory the building in the city of stone houses alone, as well as the construction of all the new houses in such a way that the main exit from the house faced the street and not the yard or garden. The fire raged five days. After it stopped it turned out that four out of the fourteen districts of the city burned out altogether while another seven districts suffered considerably. Nero opened his palaces for those without any shelter and did everything to secure the provision of the city with food avoiding death of those survived because of starvation”. [13]

Did Nero recite the poem on the destruction of Troy while looking at the Rome fire? More likely than not. The city of Rome (Mir) had been founded by none other but the Troyans, and Nero burned out the old parts of the city built up by the Troyans, its founders. Nero intended to burn “the old world” out of the people’s memory, and to achieve this he had not only to burn out the city but also to physically destroy the old Russian civilization including the killing of its representatives. Nero also “appointed” those who were responsible for Rome’s fire: they were the Christians whom Nero began to prosecute. But why they and not, for example, Judaists who were present in Rome in large enough numbers? Some commentators saw in that the “intrigues of the Judaists”. However the latter could be Nero’s allies in this case and not more than that. Many historians allege the Christians were a “judaestic sectarians”. But, first, Christianity came into being not in Judea but in Galilee which the Jews called Pagen Galilee. Jesus Christ as well as God’s mother were born in Galilee. Secondly, the first Christians in Rome were not Jews who came from Judea but those people who came from Troy’ the outpost of the ancient Russian civilization in the Mediterranean destroyed by the Roman emperors. Under Nero they found themselves the most illegitimate dwellers of the city. Nero intended to fully “free the city” from the presence of the bearers of the past civilization. They were already “erased” from history. Historians believed that Nero was struggling not against the former masters of Rim-Mir but against the representatives of “a new religion”. “Such is the fate of the “cultural” islands… That it was that that happened to the Russians in Western Europe obviously means that the Russian population, being just more cultured than the surrounding autochthons, lived mostly in cities. Or in some other key places for example in castles like the Tampliers. Which in the historical perspective doomed them to being defeated in the absence of the supporting environment”.[6]

It is known well that all that is near is the well forgotten old. Just that happened to the “first wave of Christianity” which turned out to be the return to the old Russian orthodox Christian vedism with its belief in one God of Three head – Trinity – Troyan. This Christianity is called apostolic. It is considered that later Christianity in Rome was victorious and became the official religion of the Roman Empire. But it is not quite so. It was the “second wave of Christianity” that went far away from Christ’s commandments and of his apostles and infected with religious selfishness and claims on world domination. It should be remembered that most of Christ’s apostles had Slavic roots and belonged to the Great Russian civilization including the entire territory of the future Roman Empire with the spiritual centre in ancient Jerusalem recognized by everybody.

As early as in the first book of the Old Testament mention is made of the meeting of Abraham with Melhicedek, the tsar of Jerusalem (Salima) and God’s priest. It is clear from the text that Abraham, as God willed, joined the religion of Melhicedek’s tribe, the religion of the Great Russian civilization, which was Russian orthodox vedism… “And Melhicedek, the tsar of Salima, brought out bread and wine. He was God Almighty’s priest. And he blessed him and said: Blessed is Abraham by God Almighty, the Master of Heaven and Land; and Blessed is God Almighty who gave your enemies into your hands. Abraham gave him one tenth of everything”. [2: 14; 18 – 20] Apostle Pavel specifies: “For Melhicedek, the tsar of Salima, the god Almighty’s priest, - the one who met Abraham and blessed him… in the first place, by the expression of the name the tsar of the truth and then the tsar of Salim, that is the tsar of the world…”.[3: 7; 1 – 2] It is seen from this that Salim and Mir is the Slavic have the same meaning. Mir is the Slavic name of Rim (Roma). This proves that Troy, Rim (Mir) and Salim (Jerusalem) are the cities of one and the same ancient Russian civilization, and sacred cities at that. All this taken together may be denote as the Antiquity. Antique means Russian. “Ant” is the Latin designation of Russians with some negative connotation. The term “antique” experienced some metamorphosis owing to the in-born European selfishness. It is impossible to deny that all European civilization emerged from Antiquity. But it is possible to change the meaning of the notion itself. The term “Antique” began to be used by Europeans to denote Greek and Roman olden times deliberately “forgetting” their Russian sources. Struggling against Christianity and struggling against the heritage of old Russian civilization turned out to be the same thing. And later Europeans calling themselves Christians struggled with genuine Christianity calling it fighting paganism. “But the matter is that in early Christianity there was not any contradiction between paganism and Christianity. For the fact that Christianity from our Russian paganism. More correctly, not from paganism but from vedism. Because paganism is a bad copy for when the sacred goes away it is not understood and only external forms are copied. Some parody, so to speak. That is that vedism is what turned into Christianity. But I was always sure that Jesus always wanted to return the truth”. [10]

The outstanding Russian researcher V. A. Chudinov shows on concrete material that the Russia-Slavic language was the ancient sacred language not only of the whole of Europe but also of the sacred land of Palestine. “My book “Coded language of Russian icons” will come out of print in a couple of months, and there almost on all the icons, not only on Russian ones but on Byzantine and Roman icons the site of the action is always indicated: Jarov Rus – Jerusalem, practically, Yar–Rus–Olim…- In that way, most likely. And Jordan – I-yar-dan… About three years ago I bought two books devoted to Biblical mythology. And yesterday just took them with me to read during my trip. What interested me? The mountain Sinai… My God! The whole of it consists of faces. The central face… It is some man with grey hair. And this is what is written there: Generation. Sinai – it is where God gave Moses the tables. It is thought so. Look further. Not at the icon, but at a miniature out of some Byzantine manuscript. There is a young man who got these tables. It is not clear at first sight what is shown there. I like upside down. It is written there: the Map of Rus. And where this is what is written. Here are your tables, those laws which God gave Moses. If we take the words “Jarova Rus” with the [a] the pronunciation “a” (it came not from the XII century as we are assured but it emerged in the South much earlier). That is why it was pronounced not “jarova” but as “arova” and even “arava”. And hence “Arabia” which is just “Arava Rus”. Then the “arab” from here too. In other words, there are Russian territories which were later populated by Semetic tribes. And the Arab language also came from here. – Yes, it came from here and that is why there is much in common with the Russian language up-to now.

At present Jerusalem is thought of as the capital of the Jewish state of Israal. There are claims on Jerusalem as their capital by Palestinian Arabs who are creating their own state and thinking it is only the sacred city of Jerusalem must be its capital. That neither the Arabs nor the Jews are the first inhabitants’ dwellers of Jerusalem, Palestine or Arabia is proven by the Old Testament. Jerusalem is the sacred city for every Christian in the world as the site of Jesus Christ’s ascension onto the Golgofan Cross for saving all mankind and every human soul. It was Jerusalem that was chosen by Jesus Christ for his Crucifixion feat for it was the sacred city that long belonged to the jevuseas. The name itself of this Slavic tribe means “pious”. And it was the pious Melhicedek who blessed Abraham for the service to God. Melhicedek’s last descendant was the holy Virgin Maria, the chosen one by God who became Our Lady. Incidentally, turning with his message to the Jews, Pavel has in view not the “Jewish nationality but all the tribes which came to the holy city Jerusalem. The matter is that the term Jew originally meant nothing else but newcomer and only later this term began to be applied to the “Jewish nation” which turned out to be a newcomer to the Holy Land.

It is necessary to remember here that all European peoples except the Slavs happened to be newcomers to the Old Russian land. They were led here by God so as they could learn the true religion from the Slavs. But they not only failed to learn anything, they drove out the orthodox people and destroyed part of them. And it was not accidental; it was a manifestation of the “all embracing law” of the capture of foreign land. “First the surrounding rural territory is more or less densely populated; then penetration takes place into the cultural centres as well as the increasing density of the migrants settling there, unlike the situation among the city dwellers within the city walls. More and more people come from the rural environs which leads to the formation of the cultural mass. Then the struggle begins for decisive power ending in suppression, enslavement and eviction or extermination of the former masters. And the denial pf their existence at all at any time… Thus the first winners were the Latins, then the Germans and the Greeks. Thus were also “digested” the other Russian lands such the perished Atlantis”. [6] The same method was characteristic of the Jews in their behaviour towards the blessed tribe of Melhicedek: it was not the cities that were populated at the start but the surrounding rural area with the deportation from them into the isolated cultural centres (Jerusalem in particular) of the original population. Then took place the irreversible conquest of those centres with the replacement of the population, culture and language. In this sense the Jews were no better that the Europeans. But there is one peculiarity. “The new Europeans” fully rejected old Russian vedism while the Jews accepted Melhicedek’s belief although in a simplified and, therefore destroyed way. And they were prepared to suffer for which they were marked by God.

One cannot deny that the Jewish people were the chosen one by god but it is necessary to clearly define the boundaries of the “chosenness”. God certainly knew about the recalcitrance and depravity of that people, knew that as punishment for their sins that people would have to be evicted from the Promised Land and dispersed all over the world. And God chose them exactly in order they should carry the religion of God’s oneness all over Europe. By doing so God gave the Judeas the opportunity to expiate their sins and obtain absolution by God. At the same time God forbade the Jews imposing their religion on other peoples because that religion turned out to be too distorted. The distortions were to be corrected by Christians. It should be noted that European Christians have failed to cope with this task well enough. And it is only Russian Orthodox Christianity strengthened by the Orthodox vedic traditions is capable to give the world the “cleared branch of Christianity”, leading to the saving of the whole world.


Literature

  1. Asmus V. F. The philosophy of antiquity. M., 1976.

  2. Genesis, ch. 14

  3. To Jews, ch. 7

  4. Kalinin A. Two-faced Janus // Science and life, 2007, №5 // nki.ru/archive/10240/

  5. Word on Igor’s Regiment // Zhukovski V. A. Works, vl. 3.M., 1980 // as.lib.ru/z/zhukowskiy_w_a/text_0126.shtml

  6. Somnikov A. I. The puzzle of the verbal contradiction Mir – Rim //www.runitsa.ru/…/publikation_359.php

  7. Troy – the fall of the Myth? // Technology of youth, 1988, №8 // tzone.kulichki.com/anomal/troyam.html

  8. Tunyaev. A. A. The history of the emergence of the world civilization. Slav culture as the maternal culture for all modern religion // Organizmika.org/.ru

  9. Chudinov V. A. The Contribution of the researchers of Slav countries into the discovery of pre-Cyrillic writing // Pre-Cyrillic Slav writing and pre-Christian Slav culture: Proceedings of the 1st international congress (12-14 May 2008). – SPb., 2008. – Vol. 1. – pp. 7-21.

  10. Chudinov V. A. Gods change. My answers to Mikhail Zadornov // www.antiktory.org/index.php?...

  11. ru.wikipedia/org/wiki/Antiquity

  12. tyani.nm.ru/Stat/troya/htm

  13. wiki.bks-tv.ru/wiki/Nero





Похожие:

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /Troy/1.doc
2. /Troy/10.doc
3....

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconOverview Russian English Лист3 Sheet 1: Russian

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /Troy/6.doc
2. /Troy/7.doc
3....

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /Triangle.doc
Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconAcademia Latina III 2nd –10th August 2008 Rome

Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconAlexander Verkhovsky Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Nationalist, Xenophobic
«The Bases of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church» adopted at the Jubilee Council
Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /jerusalem-e.txt
Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /Jerusalem-94.doc
Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconДокументы
1. /jerusalem.txt
Zhuravlev I. K. Troy – Rome – Jerusalem: the Russian triangle iconПерерождение глазами православного христианина Журавлёв И. К. Перерождение глазами православного христианина // www rusobsch ru/zhuravlev html
Журавлёв И. К. Перерождение глазами православного христианина // www rusobsch ru/zhuravlev html
Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
Документы


База данных защищена авторским правом ©podelise.ru 2000-2014
При копировании материала обязательно указание активной ссылки открытой для индексации.
обратиться к администрации
Документы

Разработка сайта — Веб студия Адаманов